×

警告訊息

您所使用的瀏覽器的安裝版本已過時,不再受 Konveio 支援。請升級您的瀏覽器至最新版本。

Architecture Boards August

檔案名稱:

-

檔案大小:

-

標題:

-

作者:

-

主題

-

Keywords:

-

建立日期:

-

修改日期:

-

創作者:

-

PDF 製作人:

-

PDF 版本:

-

頁數:

-

頁面大小:

-

快速 Web 檢視:

-

選擇選項 Alt text(替代文字)可在人們看不到圖片或無法載入圖片時提供幫助。
以 1-2 句描述主題、場景或行動的句子為目標。
用於裝飾性影像,如邊框或水印。
正在準備文件以進行列印…
0%
文件正在載入中 詞彙表載入中 ...
Konveio提供技術支援
查看全部

評論

關閉

本文件的評論已結束。


建議
Addendum comment: Since this is a "plaza" - need to animate with uses for people eg: restaurants with outdoor seating.

Otherwise no one is going to use the space.
建議
For Street level - Consider reflecting the scale of the 1st and 2nd floors of the masonry building across the street. Tis looks pretty high at Street level. It would be good to consider the Centre Street "corridor" in a more unified way.
建議
Scale and materials of these storefronts is not in keeping with community scale. It is looking too corporate, too "Madison Avenue".
Since restaurant tenants were lost with the demo of the jail perhaps these could be restaurants with outdoor seating to animate the space vs just being a passageway. (the old circa 1980 "passage' was pretty bad and filled with parked cars. Best to robustly counter that and animate the space with people functions.
Also - will this be an active street for autos?
建議
Clarify height regarding max allowable per new zoning. And clearly indicate the Mechanical on the roof.

Re: mechanical - It should be set back to reduce apparent building height.
建議
I think there is a misunderstanding that Collect pond is important to the neighborhood. Please observe activity.

Regardless - materiality should be more compatible with the limestone on the tombs, state court and courts in Foley square. This really looks too glassy.
建議
Understand that this is the prime view of the building. Not the view from Collect Pond or up Centre Street. Again - the materiality and height needs to be more of an extension of the existing building (see the circa 1941 addition that was just demolished for scale and material continuity.
建議
Re: The quadrant of the tower closest to the park - to mitigate effect on the park and to be more compatible with the existing building massing - please try to lower this quadrant. Understanding the square footage would need to be added to another quadrant; say the one on the north west. I would even sacrifice the allowed zoning height (which was upscaled along with the FAR to make this building possible)